A few months back, I downloaded a few Twitter applications for my iPhone. Yes, more than one. I do that a lot with (free) apps since it’s the only way I can figure out which ones are right for me. When you use as many Web tools as I do (as often as I do) speed and usability become paramount.
The problem is, I never bothered using any of them. I’ve tried to get into Twitter, but micro-blogging has never really appealed to me–well, until now, anyway.
Long story short, I’ve recently come to accept two important facts of internet life:
- Twitter isn’t the passing fad I thought it would be. To the contrary, it’s still gaining in popularity more than 2 years after its release. According to a February ’09 report from Web traffic analysis site Compete.com, Twitter is now the third most popular social networking site behind Facebook and MySpace.
- Twitter is a symbol how internet users are now essentially online all the time. Smart phones and WiFi have really changed where we connect, when we do it, and how often we can do it. We can both have lives and yet stay in constant connection with the Web and our peers, which is a huge shift from just a couple of years ago. Sure people still have their stereotypes: To a lot of folks, if you’re online, you must be at your computer in your mom’s basement, drinking a 2-liter Mt. Dew and arguing with strangers over which “World of Warcraft” characters are the coolest. But regardless of stereotypes, things are really changing. Look at teenagers: Even the cool kids are always texting, Facebooking, Twittering, etc.
As a self-respecting multimedia journalist, I know that I should accept Twitter as the increasingly popular tool that it is. Yet it’s that journalistic part of me that really needs to decipher what’s behind the popularity of this whole micro-blogging thing. Both Facebook and MySpace offer “status update” tools in addition to myriad cool features that Twitter doesn’t have. So why do we Twitter?
While even Twitter CEO Evan Williams can’t answer that question (as he’s stated in multiple interviews) perhaps the Times of London can. Just yesterday the Times published an article in which they asked several experts about the Twitter phenomenon. The conclusion was this: We Tweet because we have an underdeveloped sense of the self. Ouch.
From the article:
The clinical psychologist Oliver James has his reservations. ‘Twittering stems from a lack of identity. It’s a constant update of who you are, what you are, where you are. Nobody would Twitter if they had a strong sense of identity.’
‘We are the most narcissistic age ever,’ agrees Dr David Lewis, a cognitive neuropsychologist and director of research based at the University of Sussex. ‘Using Twitter suggests a level of insecurity whereby, unless people recognise you, you cease to exist. It may stave off insecurity in the short term, but it won’t cure it.’
For Alain de Botton, author of Status Anxiety and the forthcoming The Pleasures and Sorrows of Work, Twitter represents ‘a way of making sure you are permanently connected to somebody and somebody is permanently connected to you, proving that you are alive. It’s like when a parent goes into a child’s room to check the child is still breathing. It is a giant baby monitor.’
Those are some pretty strong accusations. But what do you think? Are those of us who Tweet or update our statuses on Facebook and MySpace narcissistic? Are we insecure? Do we need validation?
For me… I just think it’s fun. No harm, no foul. But what do you think? Are we truly just a bunch of big, fearful, attention-seeking babies?
Let me know. And while you’re at it, follow me (and my lacking sense of self) on Twitter. You can do that at right.
Rima Chaddha Mycynek is a writer, reporter, editor, photographer, videographer, former talk show host, and all-around journalism nerd. She currently teaches multimedia journalism at Boston University. [
Related Articles
9 users responded in this post
This reminds me of the panic last year about how computers were making us stupid…because kids were being polite to each other in dorms. Some academics literally have no tools to figure out modern communication methods, so they freak.
Psychologists are the narcissists for thinking we care what they think.
Hah, good points, both of you. Here are comments from a couple of my students via Twitter:
Lynn Marie: “The whole point of the internet is to communicate and share our thoughts and ideas. That does not mean we are narcissists!”
Ashlie: “We are in a completely narcissistic age. In my personal opinion, that is half the cause of the problems of the world.”
Two vastly different opinions!
I’m inclined to agree with the majority here–I don’t think we’re being narcissistic in our desire to keep in touch. (And keeping in touch is the main reason why I use Facebook and now Twitter.) Of course it is nice to let people know what I’m doing these days: I fully admit that one of my first Tweets was about my new kitchen. But does that really make me or anyone else a narcissist?
It’s food for thought.
I do agree with Ashlie that narcissism is one of humanity’s worst traits because it can lead to bad choices and worse actions. And I’m sure these social networks do have their share of narcissists!
Haha! I agree with Elliott. Psychologists have too much time on their hands that they probably secretly have their own Twitter/Facebook/Myspace themselves
I was just thinking about this today. I think it’s true, but this medium wouldn’t really work if we weren’t equally curious about other people and what they are doing.
I’d say no. What is the difference in Facebook and talking to your friends about your interest and thoughts. I don’t think that is narcissistic. I think it’s called social interaction. This is the next evolution of the species.
If it is a valid point about the narcissism, I doubt many people will agree because we don’t like to hear negative things about ourselves, no matter how true. Whether it is a valid point or not, I have no idea. Personally I never understood twitter, because there are facebook and myspace and texting and everything else, why do we need another way to tell people what we are doing every 5 minutes?! Next thing you know, bathroom breaks and sex and ‘ooooh baby jon just pooped green’ will be announced to everyone.
In response to Goddess J: Haha! Some people already post personal things like that!
But in all seriousness, I agree. No one likes hearing bad things about himself or herself.
I just disagree with the idea that we’re *all* narcissists. I do think that people who are narcissistic will come through more clearly as narcissists via sites like Facebook and Twitter, but as for the rest of us… maybe we do, too?
I mean, I really enjoy telling people about cool things in my life. But it’s not because I want them to be jealous or anything like that. I just want to share the things that make me happy. And I do try to tone it down. (It’s not like I post about every little thing–most recently I mentioned my new kitchen, which I think was definitely worth talking about.)
The same thing, I think, applies to people who constantly and consistently post “woe-is-me” status messages. Sure, some want attention because they’re narcissists and need to be validated through others’ attention. But most other people, I think, just want to express their emotions because it makes them feel better to do so.
?????? ????-????? 2008 ???? ?? 200 ??. ???? ????????. ??????!!!
+7 960 200 9209
Leave A Reply