I’ve learned several surprising things in the two days since asking, “What’s so appealing about Twitter?” Among them:
- Lots of celebrities use Twitter and if you follow enough of them, some will eventually start following you back. This is the case with Yoko Ono, who not only supposedly reads my Tweets now but who has also sent me a direct message via the site. Now, I’m almost positive she uses a third-party site to auto-contact all of her followers–but she also sent along another, more special note just for me. Being the huge Beatles fan that I am, the experience of hearing from John Lennon’s widow has left me feeling a little star-struck. I’ll admit I’m a little embarrassed by that.
If you’re interested, you can search the Web for reliable lists of celebrity Twitterers, but some of my favorites are Shaquille O’Neal, Virgin Group Chairman Richard Branson and, of course, the truly amazing John Cleese. - Experienced Twitterers can come up with really clever ways to say a lot while staying within the meager 140-character limit. That might not sound too impressive to some of you social-networking veterans who have mastered succinctness in your status messages, but if you’re a journalist, you’ll understand that brevity–effective brevity–is nothing less than a fine art. There is a reason they call it “the soul of wit.” Twitter even has awards for the best “short content” creators.
There are, of course, some Twitterers who haven’t fully embraced the concept of brevity just yet. If 140 characters isn’t enough for them, they’ll just continue their message in a second, third, fourth or even fifth post. Yes, I’m looking at you, Dr. Drew. - Congress Tweets. And texts. And chats. And… does pretty much everything with their phones except take notes on important events? Here’s an excerpt from the The Washington Post‘s article on what, exactly, our leaders were doing during President Barack Obama’s address to Congress last night:
President Obama spoke of economic calamity and war last night in that solemn rite of democracy, the address to the joint session of Congress. And lawmakers watched him with the dignity Americans have come to expect of their leaders: They whipped out their BlackBerrys and began sending text messages like high school kids bored in math class.
“One doesn’t want to sound snarky, but it is nice not to see Cheney up there,” Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) announced as Obama entered the chamber.
“I did big wooohoo for Justice Ginsberg,” Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) broadcast, misspelling the name of the ailing Supreme Court justice. McCaskill could be seen applauding with BlackBerry in one hand.
“Capt Sully is here — awesome!” announced Rep. John Culberson (R-Tex.), spotting the US Airways pilot in the gallery.
Then there was Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.), in whose name this text message was sent at about the time the president spoke of the need to pull the country together: “Aggie basketball game is about to start on espn2 for those of you that aren’t going to bother watching pelosi smirk for the next hour.” A few minutes later, another message came through: “Disregard that last Tweet from a staffer.”
Wow. Seriously? My students pay far better attention in class! And as special as I think each and every one of their smiling faces happens to be, none of these students is ever going to have the effect on my taxes, bank account and general livelihood that Congress will.
Do we need to start confiscating their cell phones?
Rima Chaddha Mycynek is a writer, reporter, editor, photographer, videographer, former talk show host, and all-around journalism nerd. She currently teaches multimedia journalism at Boston University. [
Related Articles
12 users responded in this post
That is so ridiculous—maybe Congress should invest in one of those cell phone scramblers!
Hah! Seriously. If I can’t get iPhone reception in some of the theaters at the AMC @ Park Street in Boston, they shouldn’t be able to get it in the hallowed halls of Congress!
I can’t believe they think it’s kosher to behave like this. Call me old-fashioned, but I think it’s a sign of disrespect to both our president and the American people. I also think it’s really irresponsible. Do they pay attention in session, or do they text then, too?
That is absolutely ridiculous. Talk about narcissism! What is so much more important than the president talking to you that it can’t wait 45 minutes??
Obviously, Jenn, the importance to Sen. McCaskill centered on telling the world that she gave a “woohoo” for Justice Ginsberg [sic]. If the world didn’t know that she woohoo’d, they might not like her as much or sit next to her at the homecoming game.
I really think twittering during the president’s speech is not something worth getting annoyed about.
Congressmen aren’t there to listen. Most of those guys already know everything about each others platforms. It’s when they are behind the scenes in phonecalls and meetings that they make up their minds, or change them. It’s not like a class of students that needs to learn biology. These guys already know the subject. Sitting in the audience is more a mandatory performance than anything else.
Sitting there, is mostly a waste of time for them (outside of being seen on camera). So twittering is actually informative and connects the public to our politicians. So I think it can be a good thing, depending on what the guy says.
Tom: Valid point and good response as always. But I think the “what” the guy says, as you point out, is really important.
Congressmen and women could use these tools to inform the public about matters related to what the president says–in fact, I’m sure many do. But to avoid this, I feel, is a sign of disrespect to both the president and the people.
Sure you and I (and most people) know that the politicians already know what’s going on and what’s going to be said. But I feel like they should also show that they care about the issues and aren’t ignoring them completely. It just looks bad.
I definitely agree with that. The comment about a sports game was ill advised.
it would be cool if some news organization would have a running message board at the bottom of the tv screen of the comments made by official twitters from the congressmen in the room DURING the speech. Maybe that would inspire some smart twittering…though I’m not a big fan of the comment system.
Now THAT’s forward thinking. Once again, good call.
thanks Rima.
btw…your comment balloons get me in the mood for some chocolate……
I’d do the same.. seriously, we the people might find what he has to say interesting.. But someone in politics hears all the same “We can we must change is gonna come blah blah blah” all the time..
I’d bring a laptop and play L4D, or listen to an iPod..
Off the subject of congressional twitterers and on to the subject of celebrity twittering (specifically the Yoko Ono stuff you mentioned on the page), I think it’s entirely unsurprising that a celebrity of any caliber might want to send you a personal message. The way you put yourself out there openly and publicly in the manner that you do, you seem very credible. Not just like some weird creeper fanatic. Nobody likes a weird creeper fanatic… Just saying.
Twitter response in 140 chars: Celebs and politicians that are in touch with their fans are cewl but worklife should be their main focus
Leave A Reply